The New Digg Version 4.0 Alpha

Ever since Kevin Rose decided to take over the leadership role at Digg, there has been a lot of conversation and speculation over the coming Digg v4.0, but today we need to speculate no more, as Alpha invite emails have gone out and we have been provided a limited look into the new Digg v4.0 Alpha. We have also been given the go ahead to blog about it, so here we go.

The new version of the site is being hosted at http://new.digg.com, where you are provided the ability to log in, if you have been provided access, or to sign up for an invite to Alpha at a later date. I believe that only a small handful of top users and Digg staff are currently being allowed to access the new version of the site at this time.

Once inside you are immediately provided a list of suggested profiles that you might be interested in following. It is interesting to note that only publishers, celebrities, and company profiles are being recommended, and not any normal users (even when some of the profiles have only 1 or 2 followers). Very similar to type of accounts Twitter suggests when signing up for a new account.

Next you are given the option to connect your email, Facebook, or Twitter accounts to find more people to follow. After which you are taken to ‘My News’ which is your dashboard of recommended content based on the people you follow, very similar to the previous Recommendation section.

From this section on through the site, there are a large number of both big and small changes to the site, but many of the original features are still around, even if shown or named in a different way.

You will notice on your own some of the smaller changes that we will not spend time showcasing, like the navigational buttons moving to the left side, bury being replaced by the single option report, and favorites becoming saved, but lets look at some of the more important or interesting changes.

Categories seem to have had a major overhaul, not with name changes or additions, but rather with all the sub-categories being removed and only having one main top level category to choose from now. Even the Images and Video categories have been removed.

Additionally, categories have been removed from ‘My News’ section completely and have even been removed from the article pages as well. Even the urls all use simply /story/ instead of categories. http://new.digg.com/story/50_Pets_That_Are_Guaranteed_to_Make_You_Go_AWWW_PICS

Speaking of the article page, there are a few quick changes you will notice there as well.

Videos are now viewable on Digg without having to go to the source site (might be only for YouTube, as that is all we have seen so far).

Comments are also separated now into people you follow and then all comments.

Lastly, a small and rather out of place ‘most dugg comments’ box is tossed up in the right corner, making three different options for your comment viewing pleasure.

Submitting content has never been easier on Digg. Where you used to have to go through screen after screen to submit content in the past, you know have to simply insert your url in the submit box, which is on many different sections of the site.

Once the url is inserted, it drops down all the options you need to submit your article, offering suggested title and description, allowing the selection of a thumbnail, and lastly picking the proper category for the submission.

Click ‘Digg it’ and the submission is complete.

It also appears Digg has made efforts to eliminate duplication by not allowing any variations of the url to be submitted. So if you have one version of the url already submitted, then submitting the same url with the additional feedburner parameters will no longer cause the submission to be a duplicate.

However, they removed the suggested duplicate submissions screens (as far as we can tell) so when submitting the same story as one found on the front page from a completely different site, but with the exact same title, it was still able to be submitted.

Lastly, and probably one of the biggest changes Digg has made with this new version, is the ability for publishers to verify their ownership of a site and then have all their content auto-submitted to Digg.

Once you submit your feed, through the settings section on the site, then you are asked to verify your feed by ‘simply copying and pasting the verification key provided into your next post, you can place it either in the title, body or hidden in an HTML comment.’

Of course Digg is asking people to make custom feeds that only includes their most popular or featured content, so that it does not end up spamming their site with submissions, but this is not really likely to happen, as you can see from the video below:

After spending a few hours playing with the new Digg, there is honestly still a lot to digest. Many of the changes are probably based on statistics of how many people used the features, but it seems a little odd to remove all sub-categories or how allowing auto submissions from feeds will be received by Diggers.

This is also the Alpha version, so we will see what additional changes are made from now until Beta comes out.

Have you heard about the 'Internet Marketing Experience'?

Twice a year we bring together the brightest minds in Internet marketing for a conference experience unlike anything else.

Learn more about BlueGlass LA 2012BlueGlass LA 2012 is taking place on April 23rd & 24th, 2012 in Los Angeles, CA. There are less than 100 tickets available and each show has sold out in the past.

Comments

  1. Are publishers likely to use the auto submit? Unless digg removes the advantage that power accounts have and the 24 hour time to go hot then I can’t see how this will work in peoples favour.

    • Brent Csutoras says:

      This is a big question mark on the new Digg right now. Sure Digg might support the concept of sites submitting their own content, but then they have supported companies making profiles all along and that has not worked out at all. The problem is the userbase that is voting the content to the front page, doesn’t want to see a company auto submitting content. Especially when that company is submitting about 20 articles a minute.

    • Mark Nunney says:

      A publisher can easily set up a Digg RSS feed and hold back content it wants to ‘promote’, timing its release to its convenience. Digg have already invited many publishers to submit their RSS feeds and the smart ones already have these systems in place.

  2. think you forgot to embed the video?

  3. David says:

    So why has it taken so long to get the new version rolled out?

    The submission option seems to be similar to Reddit but have they addressed the rather random process of how it selects an image.

    I’m not really sure how many people will use the import feed for just “most popular” content and will just do “import all”…

    Also whats the time delay to when you ping the feed till when it will pick it up?

    • Brent Csutoras says:

      I think some of the delay in getting the new version out was Kevin Rose not being as involved at first and then wanting to make a number of changes once he took over running Digg again.

      As for the thumbnail, it gives you the option for a few when you are manually selecting, but it would be nice to have an option in the feed when you are automatically submitting off the feed option.

      Time will tell whether most people will use a custom feed or not, but my guess is with you that most won’t.

      • David says:

        Hmmm… i guess its going to be a wait and see but i think it will be a handful of large sites such as Mashable, Engadget, Cnet that will be flooding the new Digg via RSS feeds…

        I wonder if Reddit is taking notes for its update…. its well due for following Digg….

  4. jeff says:

    i dont like

  5. Ronnie Jacobsen says:

    All that for 2 years or so of work. Digg has lost it’s way, it’s relevance and all hope as they don’t have a technological edge any more so now they have no ability to differentiate. This is the next Bebo.

  6. infobitz says:

    Digg is digging its way down. I believed they dont have that edge from others.

  7. Matt McGee says:

    Can’t just be a handful of power users, cuz I also got an invite on Friday, and I”m the furthest thing from a power user. :-)

    I like what I see, but I don’t spend too much time on digg, so I’m not aware of all the small details you uncovered here, Brent. Good stuff. As a casual user, I prefer the new version to what they have now.

    • Brent Csutoras says:

      That is awesome you got an account to play around Matt and good to see as well that they are doing invites a little randomly as that is the best way to get good feedback on the new changes.

      I think as the casual user, it probably will be a nicer change, as most casual users really just want to see the popular content anyway and do not spend as much time in the site voting content up or submitting. I think it is a step away from being its own social community and some of the more active users will feel the difference.

  8. Anil Valvi says:

    I have digging last 2 years. and its very great to launch new interface. i am waiting for this.

  9. B. Moore says:

    Kevin demoed the new digg live on TWiT (this week in tech) with Leo Laporte this afternoon http://twit.tv

    During the demo Kevin opened up digg to everyone who was watching twit live.

    the video will be up some time tomorrow at http://twit.tv/twit

    the big question everyone is asking is will it produce the traffic the old version pushed to sites that made it on the frontpage…..

  10. I wonder how they are going to improve the world famous Digg ban hammer.

    • Brent Csutoras says:

      Actually the new version of Digg does not ban any sites. I am not sure what the stance will be on people, but I imagine users will still get banned for breaking rules.

      • You clearly know nothing about Digg. I’d still like to know the reason I was banned.

        • Brent Csutoras says:

          Just to clarify, this article is about an unreleased version of Digg, V4 Alpha, which does not ban URLs anymore. As for users, I said that I believe they will still ban users who violate their terms of service.

  11. Matt says:

    I really missed the Upcoming section, which I used to haunt looking for good stories that never made the frontpage.

    • Brent Csutoras says:

      Yeah, they had made that page almost invisible in recent changes, but completely remove it now. My guess is they are basing these decisions on usages stats off the site.

  12. Dani says:

    I am not sure if I like it. Where will those funny pics and animals Digg is famous for be?

    It will be all News.

    Because of “traffic” all websites will auto import all RSS feeds and then it will be too much.

    We all have Google Reader with all RSS feeds and our friends we share interesting articles with.
    Why would I change from Google Reader to Digg?

  13. Websudasa says:

    I think it’s a time when every one is trying new things then y not digg…..we have to accept changes….

  14. haseeb najam says:

    Twitter…I smell Twitter :P for second step …for sure

  15. Mark Carter says:

    Thanks for this round up of the new features. It’ll be interesting to see if this is sufficient to enable Digg to catch up on lost ground.

  16. Maciej says:

    I am actually excited for this to go live. I’m sure Digg will do a great job really pulling in some great social communication tools that could level the playing field a little bit.

  17. AmyV says:

    I think that all the hardcore users will hate it at first and then get used to it, as happens every time Facebook changes. Anyone want to start a Facebook group, “Bring Back the Old Digg”? ;-)

    Seriously, though, I do find it frustrating that you can’t sort your friends activity by submissions, comments and diggs anymore (got my alpha invite yesterday). I’ve carefully curated my mutual friends over the years (a constantly evolving process) and, for example, have some people on it who don’t digg me much but whose every sub is great, so I want to see them. To not be able to see what your mutual friends are submitting is a bit frustrating.

    But, I suppose, I’ll get used to it. And maybe I’m just missing it. I haven’t spent a ton of time on the new Digg yet.

  18. Thanks for the overview of the new features. With any new website change, users are bound to revolt, but in the end they thank you for it.

  19. Derek Edmond says:

    Thanks for the great review. I just started playing w/it and wonder if “Top News’ will still populate the home page for the visitor not logged in.

    I agree with the person who commented on the lack of visibility to upcoming; it seems like you’re almost completely reliant on a network to uncover new content in this new system?

    On a funny note – I was able to re-digg a story I voted on previously in the live version :-D (most certainly a bug)

  20. guardianx says:

    the new digg is following the twitter model of followers – so published are being encouraged to get their audience to follow them on digg.com – hence the ability to auto digg all or some of your top daily content in the hope your audience who will see it on their default screen on digg will then engage with it.

    One think to note is that even front page storys are not via a redirect script as far as i can see – so there isnt any followed links…

  21. EmmJay says:

    I’ve seen it and yeah, it looks like Digg is into something yummy or … not?
    I like the new interface and I think there’s more features that we still have to see before really judging it, anyway it’s still in Alpha version…

  22. Thanks for pulling this altogether. Makes a really interesting post. I’m really enjoying your blog………….

  23. bulut says:

    thnakssssssssss

  24. Alexei Lee says:

    I’m guessing even if publishers have all their content auto-submit each day, users still need to support the content by digging it. So surely this would help filter the weaker articles, even if they are from large sites?

    Or am I being naiive?! :)

  25. xodify.com says:

    I think the new Digg 4.0 is great. Good new features. But maybe a bit to hard to get people to notice your diggs.. Anyone needs an invite? Visit my blog, xodify.com

  26. Litunovskiy says:

    It is interesting, what if all to put upside down and again to think?

  27. Scott says:

    It doesn’t look like the import function is actually importing anything. Is anyone else having this issue?

Trackbacks

  1. [...] Exclusive Sneak Preview of the New Digg! Brent Csutoras, my partner at BlueGlass, was one of a handful of social media users to be chosen to test the new Digg Version 4.0. Brent was also the first tester to get permission to share his experiences in the new Digg. So he’s put together an awesome in-depth overview of the new Digg v4.0 alpha, and is sharing exclusive screenshots @ Digg Version 4.0 Alpha. [...]

  2. [...] Info: The New Digg Version 4.0 Alpha Loading google.load('search', '1'); google.setOnLoadCallback(function(){ new [...]

  3. [...] Csutoras / BlueGlass: The New Digg Version 4.0 Alpha  —  Ever since Kevin Rose decided to take over the leadership role at Digg, there [...]

  4. [...] Ever since Kevin Rose decided to take over the leadership role at Digg, there has been a lot of conversation and speculation over the coming Digg v4.0, but today we need to speculate no more, as Alpha invite emails have gone out and we have been provided a limited look into the new Digg v4.0 Alpha. We have also been given the go ahead to blog about it, so here we go. The new version of the site is being hosted at Read ahead [...]

  5. [...] The New Digg Version 4.0 Alpha, blueglass.com [...]

  6. [...] The New Digg Version 4.0 Alpha, blueglass.com [...]

  7. [...] Digg For Victory   Leave a comment Aged social bookmarking rocker Digg has undergone some spring cleaning and is about to be unleashed. Digg Version 4.0 has arrived. [...]

  8. [...] been opened up to a select group (even we are lucky enough to have been given an invite).  This blog post via BlueGlass gives you an insight.  Also Mercedes Benz has decided to get on the iPad with their new app which [...]

  9. [...] you had the chance to check out the new Digg-4.0 alpha edition (or to read the detailed review), you should have noticed how much more emphasis is put on what [...]

  10. [...] has gotten a lot of attention for the opportunities it creates for publishers (see ReadWriteWeb and BlueGlass for details). First and foremost is the ability to create official profiles and automatically [...]

  11. [...] gotten a lot of attention for the opportunities it creates for publishers (see ReadWriteWeb and BlueGlass for details). First and foremost is the ability to create official profiles and automatically [...]

  12. [...] (See 168 more posts by Chris) Social media marketing is constantly evolving.   With the new version of Digg launching any day, the continued growth of Yahoo Buzz, and the explosion of Tumblr, you have to [...]