<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Diggin&#039; the Dirt About Infographics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blueglass.com/blog/diggin-the-dirt-about-infographics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blueglass.com/blog/diggin-the-dirt-about-infographics/</link>
	<description>Real. Clear. Results.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 19:11:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: online tutor</title>
		<link>http://www.blueglass.com/blog/diggin-the-dirt-about-infographics/comment-page-1/#comment-4424</link>
		<dc:creator>online tutor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 05:21:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.10e20.com/blog/?p=2729#comment-4424</guid>
		<description>well this is really interesting to see that offbeat has the higher percentage of the infographics and i can the reason behind is that... most of the stories over Digg are submitted with the intention of getting higher diggs... and some irrelevant story needs some sort of graphics to get noticed... so maybe this is one of the reason for such high heap in the offbeat category.... its my observation please correct me if i am wrong</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well this is really interesting to see that offbeat has the higher percentage of the infographics and i can the reason behind is that&#8230; most of the stories over Digg are submitted with the intention of getting higher diggs&#8230; and some irrelevant story needs some sort of graphics to get noticed&#8230; so maybe this is one of the reason for such high heap in the offbeat category&#8230;. its my observation please correct me if i am wrong</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rebeccakelley</title>
		<link>http://www.blueglass.com/blog/diggin-the-dirt-about-infographics/comment-page-1/#comment-4423</link>
		<dc:creator>rebeccakelley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 20:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.10e20.com/blog/?p=2729#comment-4423</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s interesting that no gaming infographics have hit in the past 30 days, especially since gaming is generally a popular subject on Digg. I wonder if it&#039;s just a coincidence or if people would rather read gaming news than see infographics for that category.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#039;s interesting that no gaming infographics have hit in the past 30 days, especially since gaming is generally a popular subject on Digg. I wonder if it&#039;s just a coincidence or if people would rather read gaming news than see infographics for that category.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
